WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Erik Guttman <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:01:47 +0100 (MET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.SOL.3.96.1040317165845.21294H-100000@suncc41> |
Please respond to this issue in the next week ending 24 Mar 04. If no
comments are received we will assume that this issue will be accepted
and the change made
----
LL46
Description of Issue: Text implies limited applicability
Submitter Name: Russ Housley
Submitter Email:
Date submitted: 20 Feb 04
Reference:
(T=tech, E=edit):
Priority (S must, 1 Should, 2 May fix):
Section: 2.2
Rationale/Explanation:
Section 2.2. It seems that this technique should work for 802.11 ad
hoc
networking too. An entry in the list that does not imply an
infrastructure
of any kind is desirable.
Long Description:
Proposed Change:
Change:
IEEE 802 hardware link-state change that indicates that a
cable was attached.
To:
IEEE 802 hardware link-state change that indicates that a
cable was attached. (This example does not imply that
IPv4LL configuration is inapplicable to wireless
interfaces).
----
Erik