Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] IESG Nits

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Russ Housley wrote:
> This note does not say what change was made.  I cannot accept or reject.

If the change was to add RFC 2434 as an informative reference, would
this satisfy your concern?

Thanks,

Erik


> At 05:04 PM 3/17/2004 +0100, Erik Guttman wrote:
> 
> >Please respond to the mailing list in the next week ending 24 Mar 04.
> >If no comments are received, the assumption is we will accept the
> >requested change.
> >
> >----
> >
> >LL47
> >
> >Description of Issue: IESG nits
> >Submitter Name:       various IESG members
> >Submitter Email:      [email protected]
> >Date submitted:       20 Feb 04
> >Reference:
> >(T=tech, E=edit):     E
> >Priority (S must, 1 Should, 2 May fix): 1
> >Section:
> >Rationale/Explanation:
> >Long Description:
> >Proposed Change:
> >
> >Ted Hardie:
> >   use IPv4LL not IPv4ll
> >
> >Russ Housley:
> >   The reference to RFC 2434 should be informative, or a reference should
> >be
> >   added in the IANA Considerations section.
> >
> >----
> >Erik
> 
> 

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
 E r i k   G u t t m a n
 N1 Content -|- Sun Microsystems               cell: +49 172 865 5497