WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL43] Clarify rules for use of LL vs routeable addresses
Erik Guttman <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:57 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.SOL.3.96.1040330172904.27834C-100000@suncc41> |
Action: Accept the change below. LL43 Description of Issue: Clarify rules for use of LL vs routeable addresses Submitter Name: Ted Hardie Submitter Email: Date submitted: 20 Feb 04 Reference: (T=tech, E=edit): T Priority (S must, 1 Should, 2 May fix): S Section: 1.4 Rationale/Explanation: Long Description: The draft has the following text in section 1.4: a. Routable addresses should be used within applications whenever they are available. b. Names that are globally resolvable to routable addresses should be used within applications whenever they are available. Names that are resolvable only on the local link (such as through use of protocols such as Link Local Multicast Name Resolution [LLMNR]) MUST NOT be used in off-link communication. IPV4 addresses and names which can only be resolved on the local link SHOULD NOT be forwarded, they SHOULD only be sent when a Link-Local address is used as the source address. This strong advice should hinder limited scope addresses and names from leaving the context in which they apply. c. Link-Local IPv4 addresses MUST NOT be configured in the DNS. A & B seem to contain contrary advice (Use routable addresses in applications vs. use names resolvable to routable addresses in applciations); this is probably because the authors see an "instead" in here that isn't stated. I'd suggest rephrasing A. I'd also suggest reversing the order so that C is first (it is the MUST here), B's advice is next (It is the SHOULD), and then the current A is "If names resolvable to globally routable addresses are not available, but the globally routable addresses are, they should be used instead of link-local addresses". Proposed Change: Replace a-c in 1.4 with a. Link-Local IPv4 addresses MUST NOT be configured in the DNS. b. If names resolvable to globally routable addresses are not available, but the globally routable addresses are, they should be used instead of link-local addresses c. Names that are globally resolvable to routable addresses should be used within applications whenever they are available. Names that are resolvable only on the local link (such as through use of protocols such as Link Local Multicast Name Resolution [LLMNR]) MUST NOT be used in off-link communication. IPV4 addresses and names which can only be resolved on the local link SHOULD NOT be forwarded, they SHOULD only be sent when a Link-Local address is used as the source address. This strong advice should hinder limited scope addresses and names from leaving the context in which they apply.