Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL64] Simplify some text

I agree with the suggested change.  While we're at it, "to whom" ought to be
replaced with "to which".

- Ralph

At 01:18 AM 5/5/2004 +0200, Erik Guttman wrote:
>Please post discussion of this issue to the mailing list over the next two 
>weeks
>ending May 18, 2004.  In order to accept this issued, we will need a strong WG
>consensus given that this is very late in the process.
>
>Please see http://www.drizzle.org/~aboba/ZEROCONF/issues.html for a list of
>current issues and their status.
>
>[LL64]
>
>Description of Issue:           Simplify some text
>Submitter Name:                 Stuart Cheshire
>Submitter Email Address:        [email protected]
>Date first submitted:           04 May 04
>Reference:
>Comment Type ['t'ech|'e'dit]:   e
>Prio ['S' Must|1 should|2 may]: 2
>Section:                        3.1
>Rationale/Explanation:
>Lengthy Description:
>
>>    The application knows
>>    the source address of the sender to whom the application will reply.
>>
>>    The first scoped address problem is source address selection. ...
>
>It's confusing. People will think: If the application knows the source
>address, how can there be a source address selection problem? How about:
>
>>    The application knows
>>    the address of the sender to whom the application will reply.
>>
>>    The first scoped address problem is source address selection. ...
>
>
>Requested Change:
>
>Change
>>    The application knows
>>    the source address of the sender to whom the application will reply.
>>
>>    The first scoped address problem is source address selection. ...
>
>to:
>
>    The application knows
>    the address of the sender to whom the application will reply.
>
>    The first scoped address problem is source address selection.