Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope

Robert Elz <[email protected]> Wed, 05 May 2004 07:56:23 +0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

    Date:        Wed, 5 May 2004 01:00:29 +0200
    From:        Erik Guttman <[email protected]>
    Message-ID:  <a05200f19bcbdce82ea64@[80.139.178.51]>

  | Lets be consistent. Can we pick one phrase? Either "outside the scope of
  | this document" or "left to a future document".

This isn't even worth discussing, the text as it stands is fine.
(It would be OK if it had used the same phrase both places, but there's
no need to go changing it now just for that purpose).

kre