RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> Thu, 6 May 2004 22:53:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>I believe it should have been random initial delay + retransmissions >spaced 1 seconds apart, rather than what somehow came out in the >document. > > MikaL A long time ago, draft-07 said: When ready to begin probing, the host should then wait for a random time interval selected uniformly in the range zero to two seconds, and should then send four probe packets, spaced two seconds apart. This initial random delay helps ensure that a large number of hosts powered on at the same time do not all send their initial probe packets simultaneously. With our new parametrized text, this becomes: When ready to begin probing, the host should then wait for a random time interval selected uniformly in the range zero to START_WAIT seconds, and should then send PROBE_NUM probe packets, spaced PROBE_INTERVAL seconds apart. This initial randomized delay helps ensure that a large number of hosts powered on at the same time do not all send their initial probe packets simultaneously. I believe this is perfectly adequate. Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc. * www.stuartcheshire.org