RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait

Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> Thu, 6 May 2004 22:53:19 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>I believe it should have been random initial delay + retransmissions
>spaced 1 seconds apart, rather than what somehow came out in the
>document.
>
>	MikaL

A long time ago, draft-07 said:

   When ready to begin probing, the host should then wait for a
   random time interval selected uniformly in the range zero to two
   seconds, and should then send four probe packets, spaced two
   seconds apart. This initial random delay helps ensure that a
   large number of hosts powered on at the same time do not all send
   their initial probe packets simultaneously.

With our new parametrized text, this becomes:

   When ready to begin probing, the host should then wait for a random
   time interval selected uniformly in the range zero to START_WAIT
   seconds, and should then send PROBE_NUM probe packets, spaced
   PROBE_INTERVAL seconds apart. This initial randomized delay helps
   ensure that a large number of hosts powered on at the same time do
   not all send their initial probe packets simultaneously.

I believe this is perfectly adequate.

Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]>
 * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc.
 * www.stuartcheshire.org