Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc

"John C. Welch" <[email protected]> Fri, 07 May 2004 08:56:33 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID <BCC0FFC1.18830FB%[email protected]>
On 5/4/04 6:24 PM, "Erik Guttman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>> 9.  Constants
>> 
>>    The following timing constants are used in this protocol.
>> 
>>    PROBE_MIN              1 second
>>    PROBE_MAX              2 seconds
>>    PROBE_N                2
>>    NUM_PROBES             3
>>    MAX_COLLISIONS        10
>>    RATE_LIMIT_INTERVAL   60 seconds
> 
> Can we list this *before* they are used in the text?

I support this. Regardless of how other RFCs do this, it is far more
sensible to define constants and other RFC specific terms prior to their
use. Again, this is not catering to the lowest common denominator, but
rather giving the people who will use this RFC more clarity in the terms
used by the RFC.

john 

-- 
"I think love is a snowmobile racing across the arctic tundra which suddenly
flips, pinning you underneath.  At night, the ice-weasels come...."

Matt Groening