Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed

"John C. Welch" <[email protected]> Fri, 07 May 2004 09:04:31 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID	<BCC1019F.1883105%[email protected]>

On 5/4/04 6:04 PM, "Erik Guttman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>      The sentence is harmless, though not very useful.  Including it
>      was necessary to get the document approved.
> 
> Requested Change:
> 
> Omit
> 
>>  (This example does
>>            not imply that IPv4 Link-Local configuration is inapplicable
>>            to wireless interfaces).

If it's the only way to get it approved, fine, but it's useless verbiage,
and really doesn't belong.

It should be deleted.

john

-- 
"Who Dares, Wins."
British Special Air Service (SAS)