Re: WG ACTION: 1 week continued discussion [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?

>   | I think the resolution of LL 58 re-introduces a normative
>   | dependency on [DNAv4].
>
> Yes (that was always there), but ...
>
>   |    A "valid routable address" is a routable address which is either
>   |    statically assigned or whose lease has not expired and that passes
>   |    the reachability test described in section 2 of "Detection of Network
>   |    Attachment (DNA) in IPv4" [DNAv4].
>
> does nothing to change that, it is still a normative reference.

The proposal is to make this a definition in the terminology section, and
remove all normative uses of the term "valid".   With the changes, the
only use of the term in the document is to describe ways in which an
address *might* be configured.