Hardship to a specific upper-layer activity?
Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:40:28 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Replace the 4 lines quoted above with (a spelling checked version of...) > > IPv4 Link-Local address may continue to be used as a source address > in communications where switching to a preferred address would > cause communications failure because of the requirements of an > upper layer protocol (e.g., an existing TCP connection). > For more details, see Section 1.7. Agreed. This more precisely captures the intended meaning. The previous wording came from Thomas Narten; unless he raises any objection to the revised text, I think we should take it. I've provisionally updated <http://files.zeroconf.org/rfc3927new.txt> with your new text. Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc. * www.stuartcheshire.org