Re: Data retention question

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16/07/2014 22:23, Roland Perry wrote:
> 
> Because all the issues have been aired at length for some time. Not
> just since April but in the debates surrounding the 2012 comms data
> bill.

So future debate is irrelevant and we should give up, they've made up
their minds because the issue's been talked about enough? This
specific bill must be fine as a result?

Speaking as a young 'un, it's no fucking wonder, pardon the French,
that we have apathy about the political system in this country. This
whole thing has me thoroughly depressed and demotivated.

- -- 
Cheers,
James Harrison
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=f5m3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----