Re: Another new Off topic: DPA question

Is the complaint or the complainer vexatious?

If not it will need to be dealt with.

Generally the public officials or bodies involved do seek efficient
management of such complaints and if they don't your MP might take an
interest.
On 18 Jul 2014 15:12, "jul kornbluth" <jul-7VEnkBLSvkGGHxnzd0C9Llpr/1R2p/[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello
>
> Another off topic question on the DPA if I may.
>
> We have had a complaint raised against our school with the Schools
> Adjudicator.   I am chair of the trustees. The School Adjudicator has
> powers virtually unchangeable,  and has tied us up in knots and numerous
> meetings.   The complainant has asked to remain anonymous.
>
> The 2012 Admission Code, which is the Statutory basis of the Adjudicators
> investigation, states clearly anonymous complaints cannot be brought. ~
> para 3.3.f)    In the Notes it states  that the person objecting must
> provide their name to the Adjudicator.  Are the notes part of the Code, or
> am I entitled to find out under the DPA who this objector is  e.g. a
> parent, prospective parent, member of staff, an unconnected outsider, or
> even a member of the governing body?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
> Jul Kornbluth
>
>
>
> On 12 June 2014 19:44, Marcus Williamson <marcus-kDEge0WCpFXYd54FQh9/[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> An off-topic question if I may:
>>
>> Is a business email address considered "personal data" under the terms of
>> the Data
>> Protection Act (DPA)?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marcus Williamson
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jul Kornbluth
> Health eSystems Ltd     (UK Company Reg.  5754837)
>
>
> 6 Dalston Gardens,         Stanmore HA7 1BU
> Phone 020 8206 3500      Fax 020 8206 3501
>
>
> e-mail      jul-7VEnkBLSvkGGHxnzd0C9Llpr/1R2p/[email protected]
> website   www.healthecard.co.uk
>