Re: Data retention question
Graham Cobb <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:38:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19/07/14 21:09, Roland Perry wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, Graham Cobb > <[email protected]> writes >> Realistically, is there much point trying to educate MPs? > > I hope so. I think there might also be some point in educating people > outside parliament on how legislation passes through the system. We will have to agree to differ: on fairly technical subjects, like crypto, I see little point in educating MPs -- concentrate the efforts on the civil servants setting policy and, particularly, those drafting the legislation. Where I do see point, is in educating MPs on "softer" topics -- more political and policy related. For example, the importance of human rights: including how the right to privacy is critical to other rights they are more aware of and already care more about, such as free expression, health, family life, safety, business, etc. It might be worth trying to educate them on how the rule of law in the Internet age is dependent on governance with consent, and that getting consent means respecting human rights, particularly those that despotic regimes ride roughshod over. Most important of all, the challenge is how to make rights such as privacy important to the electorate, so that they become important to politicians. Once that happens, crypto can take care of itself. Graham