Re: Electronic money
doug <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:01:48 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/12/14 21:40, Francis Davey wrote: > Apologies if this seems like a very stupid question (or series of > questions) but this list struck me as being the best place to ask it. > > I'm doing some writing/teaching about legal aspects of money and > payment systems on the internet (as a more general part of > e-commerce). I'm trying to get my head around what systems of > "electronic money" there are out there. Most of what I read is too > sales-oriented for me to tell what is actually going on. > > Specifically I am interested in knowing if there are any systems of > open circulation "electronic money" that don't involve smart cards or > similar physical tokens. > > By "electronic money" I mean specifically money that is a liability on > the issuer. I.e. there is an issuer and if you present your "copy" of > the electronic money the issuer must present (or will present) you > with some currency issued (say) by a sovereign state. > > By "open circulation", I mean one that allows parties to transfer the > money between them without reference to the issuer or some other > central body. > > Mondex was, as I understand it, an example of such a form of open > circulation electronic money but relied on a physical token to make > sure there was no double spending (forgive me if I have misunderstood > this point). > > NB: please no criticism of whether it actually achieved these goals :-). > > Clearly cryptocurrencies openly circulate but they aren't "electronic > money" (*) because they don't represent a liability on anyone. > > Are there any examples of such things, or are all "electronic money" > systems essentially reliant on smart cards or references back to an > issuer? > > Ultimately I am trying to work out whether there is anything new (from > a legal perspective). > > (*) There's a directive on "electronic money" and being a liability on > the issuer is an essential (though not only) part of being electronic > money. Bitcoin is not "electronic money" in that sense and so doesn't > fall within all the regulatory rules of the same. > > have you checked out C3 ?: http://www.lietaer.com/2011/09/commercial-credit-circuit-c3/ Lietaer's book 'Rethinking Money' has many examples of different types of promise money - might be a useful resource... cheers, Doug.