Re: Data held by ISPs
Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186-1HOZaDBbGgxaa/[email protected]> Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:47:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23/12/14 09:19, David Pick wrote: > On 22/12/14 22:45, Mark Harrison wrote: > >> </snip> >> IP addresses (of the subscriber) are personal data. >> >> Although it's taken a long time for this to be nailed into law (rather >> than denied by the MRD brigade). >> </snip> >> >> I'm surprised. IP addresses from ISP's are shared. They are rarely given >> to end devices but rather routers that are also shared. How could they >> be classed as identifiable? To whom under the law? > > To my mind it's not the IP address in isolation that's "Personal Data", > it's the relationship between the IP address and a person. It is *very* > important that it is acknowledged that this relationship exists because > if the relationship is not acknowledged the possibilities for miscreants > to identify people without the possibility of legal redress is enhanced. > > There are many forms the relationship can take ranging from registration > in an Internet Registry database or the DNS through to logs from the > CGNAT service used by an ISP. For each of these to be handled with the > appropriate level of care the nature of the relationship to identifiable > people must be recognised. > Yep - it's not necessary for data to be linked with a person in isolation; if it can be linked with a person in combination with some other data which might be obtained - eg ISP IP assignments - then it is personal data. Or, the IP a personal email is sent from is personal data at that time. PS I have a fixed IPv.4 IP address (actually 8 of them), packets addressed to which will come to my personal computer (or computers I run). It isn't that uncommon, most ISPs offer the choice of a fixed IPv.4 address even now, though they may charge extra. When IPv.6 really gets going I suspect that most IPs will be fixed. -- Peter Fairbrother