Re: Data held by ISPs
Ian Batten <igb-BFib/[email protected]> Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:29:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 28 Dec 2014, at 17:47, Roland Perry <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <AD0AB2BB-D50A-4581-9CD4-BDA1C5F7F8D9-BFib/[email protected]>, Ian Batten <igb-BFib/[email protected]> writes >>> When IPv.6 really gets going I suspect that most IPs will be fixed. >> >> It depends on what you mean by "most". Most fixed line (DSL, Cable, etc) will be fixed, because >> ISPs will probably get one or more /40 and therefore will obtain addresses in blocks of 2^24. Very >> few ISPs have more than 16 million fix-line customers, and the few that do will have either multiple >> /40s or something larger. >> >> However, the mobile operators will probably use SLAC or DHCPv6 to allocate addresses within a single /64 >> per [some network organisational block], and most mobile devices use RFC 4941 privacy extensions >> (and sometimes can't turn them off: I get really annoyed that all the iDevices at home get fresh >> IPv6 addresses every hour). Given |mobile devices|>|fixed lines|, most IPs will in fact be dynamic. > > Does that mean that if I use an IPv6 mobile dongle to get my Internet Access that they won't be providing me with a /48 to play with? > > I was under the impression that end-points in most of the RIR regions needed special permission to be issued with less than that. RFC3177 recommends a /64 for mobile devices with another interface (ie Bluetooth or WiFi) so you can network beyond the device. I suspect, however, that you won't get that. Does anyone know of a phone operator offering genuine IPv6 connectivity? Allocating a fixed /48 would be tricky for roaming devices (something that RFC3177 probably predates), and my experience of IPv6 over PPPoE is that it only negotiates a /64 for the link and leaves the rest of the allocation up to you. ian