Re: ICR "Unique Identifiers"
Marcus Williamson <marcus-kDEge0WCpFXYd54FQh9/[email protected]> Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:55:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This statement in the document is false, as far as I can see from a = technical perspective: "ICRs therefore provide the unique identifier to distinguish between = different users of a shared IP address" On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:08:20 +0000, you wrote: >https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil= e/473745/Factsheet-Internet_Connection_Records.pdf = <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil= e/473745/Factsheet-Internet_Connection_Records.pdf> > >> However, without the retention of ICRs, resolving an IP address back = to a single user will often not be possible as multiple users may be = associated with that IP address. ICRs therefore provide the unique = identifier to distinguish between different users of a shared IP address.= =20 >>=20 >>=20 >What? What? What is this on about? I=92m guessing it means you need = to store whatever the token was that was used to issue an IP number = (IMEI, modem MAC, etc), but it=92s surely not going to be able to do = anyhing about downstream NAT? > >ian