Re: ICR "Unique Identifiers"

> On 5 Nov 2015, at 13:03, Roland Perry <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>=20
> In article <e2ek3bp6mckp2ld9bv5hnvejdj9b5tlvgb-e09XROE/[email protected]>, Marcus =
Williamson <marcus-kDEge0WCpFXYd54FQh9/[email protected]> writes
>=20
>> This statement in the document is false, as far as I can see from a =
technical
>> perspective:
>>=20
>> "ICRs therefore provide the unique identifier to distinguish between =
different
>> users of a shared IP address"
>=20
> I'm sure that this is about identifying the users behind =
carrier-grade-NAT.

I agree.

As one of my students asked after a lecture on, co-incidentally, the =
problems caused for law enforcement by CG NAT,=20
=E2=80=9Cwouldn=E2=80=99t it be better for the government to spend the =
money encouraging IPv6?=E2=80=9D

ian