Re: Draft IP-Bill enters wrap-up phase
Roland Perry <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:50:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, Dave Howe <[email protected]> writes >>> By default private internets are no more secure than the public one. >> >> Quibbling about the terminology, those are probably private intranets. >I would argue for internet - it's a externally provisioned network, with >its own centrally adminstered IPv4 space, that joins disparate locally >adminstered LANs that may or may not NAT or firewall their traffic when >talking to the other hosts on that network (but if they don't, they >should). I use a capital I when talking about the public Internet rather >than private internetworking networks, but can't recall where I picked >up that convention from. Yes the public Internet should have a capital letter like the Queen. Maybe a bunch of interconnected networks which aren't attached to the Internet could be "a" [different] internet, but I've rarely encountered that usage. >not sure what a public intranet would be, other than a contradiction in >terms? :D Quite. -- Roland Perry