Re: Anybody there?
Roland Perry <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:24:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <CAJkBBXX+A7f18Y_zczqqbdpOX+1y3Leb0T+EeR+iiGisCDwvuw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>, John Wilson <[email protected]> writes >This thread on Twitter by David Allen Green discusses this point >https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/1185820413718421504. I like this comment best: Repeal the Benn Act because it interferes with Boris Johnson's Article 1 Right to Life. Legislation cannot force someone to die in a ditch. >On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 18:52, Roland Perry ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In article <[email protected]>, Clive D.W. Feather >> <[email protected]> writes >> >> >He wrote it but didn't sign it. Then wrote another one saying "delay would >> >be a mistake". >> >> On another list, people said a week or two ago that sending two letters >> would be a "breach of the Padfield principle (Padfield v Minister of >> Agriculture [1968] AC 997) which means that the government cannot >> exercise its powers in order to frustrate a statute" >> >> But I haven't followed that up to see if such a principle would in fact >> apply (although I think he *is* exercising a power by writing both the >> 2nd and third letter). >> >> Roland Perry -- Roland Perry