Re: Finance the music industry with a $6/mo le vy on broadband (The Reg)
Chris Lightfoot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <rU7UapZaizSH.loCNKcJHjdPogykpBjeu0g@aquila> |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:43:07PM -0000, Hibbs, Phil wrote: > Some people don't buy much or download any music. Me for instance. Then > again I don't have broadband, but there's no way I'm going to contribute to > propping up a failed business that I despise. Would you have paid extra road > tax to subsidise DeLorean? It's worth saying that (at least the last time this idea came up) the point of keeping record industry revenues at their current levels is just to sweeten the deal enough that they'll accept it. Later on, if the system is well-enough designed, they can be allowed to wither on the vine. Do you think you'd download music if it were freely available and legal to do so? -- Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.