Re: BBC "evil malice Linux zealot" article
Chris <chris-3ng/Pf1MDP68qtKVGud/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Organization | I'd tell you but then I'd have to kill you |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:48:20 +0000 Jim Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone else strongly suspect that MyDoom was commissioned by SCO > or MS as part of their MS-funded (I guess) attach on Linux and open > source? Or that SCO/MS gave a big back-hander to this journalist to > write this nonsense? New Scientist have something similar in their latest print issue (doesn't appear to be online, the one that is on the NS site is more balanced, although it still managed the implication), again saying that the open-source community are suspected of being behind it. They got an email from me about that one.. But I expect the BBC are still reeling from the response their article got when slashdot found out about it: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/05/0818229&mode=thread -- =[ http://www.starforge.co.uk/ ]===[ Explorer2260 Lead Designer and Coder. ] =[ Public key: ]===================[ http://www.starforge.co.uk/pubkey.txt ] =[ Cur an hic? ] -- INDECISION is the key to FLEXIBILITY.