RE: Less balanced BBC article?

"Hibbs, Phil" <phil.hibbs-JhP/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>But over on the Entertainment desk, back to business as usual:
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/3567417.stm

I don't actually see anything wrong with that article. I don't have any
sympathy for someone that downloads 10,000 songs and has never paid for
their music. It's illegal, and I consider it to be morally wrong.

I might occasionally download a song that I can't find anywhere else, like
'In the year 2525' by Zager and Evans, or 'I'm the Doctor' by Motorhead, so
yes there is a smidgeon (sp?) of hypocrisy in my stance, but none of the
music on my iRiver iHP120 was downloaded. It was all ripped off my own CDs,
so I have now joined the ranks of civil disobedience in performing this
illegal act. Come and get me, BPI!

Phil Hibbs
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
Aston, UK


=======================================================
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
=======================================================
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.