Re: [Fsfe-ie] Swpat vote set for Tuesday, with public deliberation

Fergal Daly wrote:

> Where can I get the actual text that is being considered? I couldn't find a
> link to it on FFII,

Latest text we have is the version for which we believe the Presidency 
managed to get a qualified majority on COREPER (dated 3 May 2004)

HTML conversion:
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/cons0401/st09051/st09051.html

Original pdf:
http://vitke:[email protected]/papers/europarl0309/cons0401/SRC/st09051.en.pdf


There is a subsequent document, the final "report" from the Presidency 
to the Council of Ministers, but we believe the body of it is identical.


> 
> F
> 
> On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:16:14AM +0100, James Heald wrote:
> 
>>NB. See FFII breaking news wiki for very latest information, at
>>	http://kwiki.ffii.org/SwpatcninoEn
>>
>>
>>It looks as though there's a chance things may be moving in our favour.
>>
>>
>>The agenda for the Competitiveness Council meeting has been published, 
>>with a full discussion now scheduled on the Software Patents directive; 
>>furthermore the discussion is to be in public, ie with press and 
>>visitors able to listen in with 11-way translation.
>>http://ue.eu.int/cms3_applications/Applications/newsRoom/loadbook.asp?BID=880&LANG=1&cmsId=364
>>
>>We don't yet know whether there's any chance of it being webcast.
>>
>>
>>This a big step forward from the official EU media briefing, published 
>>only on Friday morning, which said the directive was due to be 
>>rubberstamped as an 'A-item' without discussion.
>>http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guestfr.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=MEMO/04/114%7C0%7CRAPID&lg=EN&display=
>>
>>
>>The EU media briefing also tries very hard to play the play up the Irish 
>>draft as a 'compromise' position.
>>
>>But it's clear from this report from Paul Meller that by the time of the 
>>press conference this afternoon journalists were obviously well enough 
>>briefed that the EU spokesman had to confirm everything we'd said:
>>http://www.itworld.com/Man/2687/040514eupatents/
>>
>>
>>The national positions won't finally be clear until we hear what 
>>actually gets said on Tuesday, but there are signs that there may be an 
>>increasing number of ministers with concerns about the text, and a very 
>>real possibility that a number of countries may seek a delay to give time to
>>
>> * achieve more unity;
>> * investigate further the concerns about
>>     - freedom of discussion
>>     - interoperability
>>     - scope of what is and what is not 'technical';
>> * produce a text more likely to pass the European Parliament.
>>
>>
>>On the other hand, as best we know, the UK and Ireland are still pushing 
>>all-out for the Presidency text.
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>[email protected] mailing list
>>List information: http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/fsfe-ie
>>Public archive: https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-ie
>>
> 
> 
>