Re: Today on fines for using filesharing "websites"
Rufus Pollock <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:42:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The BPI cases started back last September and there was announcements of the first settlements in March. See post on DRN: http://www.okfn.org/drn/node/43 Much of this was discussed on the creative-friends list (http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/creative-friends) at the time and there was even a suggestion of doing a press-release to counteract the one-sided coverage (the Times front-page coverage was particularly bad) but it nothing was produced rapidly enough. Of course file-sharing is not illegal but sharing large amounts of copyrighted material over the internet is. Regards, Rufus Tim Ivorson wrote: > The Today programme reported (at about 8:40) that the BPI is fining > filesharers. It ended by saying that many parents can't even set the VCR, > "but that's not a criminal offence." I wonder which isn't a criminal > offence, video ignorance or filesharing. Filesharing isn't a criminal > offence yet, is it? > > Tim Ivorson > > > > > > verified virus free by Usermail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Free-sklyarov-uk mailing list > Free-sklyarov-uk-Sspga/[email protected] > http://mailman.xenoclast.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov-uk