Re: Setting up a well-funded Digital Rights campaign organisation
Martin Keegan <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:56 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Philip Hunt wrote: > 1. Is the idea to set up a new organisation, separate to FFII? It seems to me > that FFII has done a good job with the software patents directive, and it's > not obvious to me what the benefits of a new separate organisation would be. Its inability to work on copyrights would appear to be a good reason to support the creation of an organisation additional to FFII (briefly: statistically, FFII's financial supporters on the swpat issue disfavour copyright reform). Pluralism is a value in itself. Thirdly, the pledge by its wording does not exclude giving the cash to a UK branch of FFII, or to FFI directly. > 2. The pledge says "to support an organisation that will campaign for digital > rights in the UK"; but most intellectual property law comes from Brussels > these days, so isn't it equally important, or more important, to campaign > on a European level? You need to have both the national and European levels covered due to the way the EU structures work (not a problem, say, in the US, where state entities have no formal say in federal matters), but I guess to the extent that you're saying that people setting up a digital rights campaigning organisation for the UK are in for a very rude shock about how their country is now goverened, I agree with you. Let not the best be the enemy of the good, though. Mk