Re: Message from James Purnell
Jason Clifford <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:44:41 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Tim Ivorson wrote: > I wonder how much the major labels stand to gain from retroactive > copyright extension. Wouldn't labels receive the same income from '60s > recordings, apart from those with public domain lyrics, whether or not = the > recordings' copyrights are extended? I find Cliff Richard's position on > retroactive copyright extension ( > http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/rock_n_roll_swindle.shtml ) easier to > understand. I am still trying to understand why anyone should be considered to have a= =20 right to earn money on a piece of work they completed 50 years ago and=20 from which they have enjoyed 50 years of income. The fact of the matter is that copyright is a privilege offered by societ= y=20 not a right in itself. 50 years is a fair time in which to generate rewar= d=20 from the release of a recording - indeed it's a very long time to do so=20 and anyone whose recordings achieve even a modicum of popularity will hav= e=20 made a lot of money as will the record companies and other publishers=20 involved. The claim that this is the legitimate pension fund for a one-hit wonder=20 is disingenious. Should a plumber have a right to earn income for decades= =20 off of the installation of pipes into a building? Is the situation really so very different? Why should someone who had one= =20 or two hit records in the 50s, 60s, 70, 80s, etc and who enjoyed income=20 from that in all the years since not have the same responsibility over=20 that period of time to made provision for their pension. Certainly they=20 would have been able to develop another career and earn a living from tha= t=20 as well. We're in danger of creating a new social class just for people who've had= =20 a taste of celebrity as though that were some specifically noble thing=20 that genuinely set a person aside from the rest of society for the rest o= f=20 their life if we continue down the road of accepting that they deserve=20 special consideration beyond the extremely generous consideration they=20 already receive over the term of copyright as it currently is. Jason Clifford --=20 UKFSN.ORG Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net http://www.ukfsn.org/ 2Mb ADSL Broadband from just =A314.98 / month=20