Re: [PATCH] FIX: avoid using mailbox client dev pointer for error prints
Ben Horgan <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 18:35:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andre, On 8/3/26 18:04, Andre Przywara wrote: > When a PCC channel is shared among several MSCs, all use the same > mailbox client struct, which contains the device pointer of the very > first MSC created. If that MSC goes away, the dev pointer becomes stale. > We use that pointer only for error printing, so drop that usage. We can > use the dev pointer from the MSC instead, which the callers of > mpam_fb_send_request() know. > The mailbox client code also seems to use this pointer only for error > prints, and only during initialisation, so it becoming stale afterwards > does not cause problems. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]> > --- > Hi, > > so this is the fix for the issue that Srivathsa described. This applies > on top of the v7 series posted. I put up a branch with the patch > squashed here: > https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-ap/-/commits/mpam-fb-v7-fixed?ref_type=heads > If I shall post a v8, please let me know. This fix looks good to me. A v8 seems useful, if only to make sure Sashiko runs. As you said, I think it requires the --base option to format-patch now we have conflicts with fixes. I've also commented on the error irq patch but we're looking in pretty good shape. Thanks, Ben > > Cheers, > Andre > > drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c > index 7a7fb6d067ba..79e0229b77c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c > +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > #include <linux/errno.h> > #include <linux/mailbox_client.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/types.h> > > #include <acpi/pcc.h> > @@ -128,17 +129,19 @@ static int mpam_fb_translate_error_code(int mpam_fb_code) > } > } > > -static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan, u32 msc_id, > +static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u32 msc_id, > u16 reg, u32 *result, int mpam_fb_command) > { > unsigned int token = atomic_inc_return(&mpam_fb_token); > struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory __iomem *pcc_shmem; > + struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan; > struct pcc_mbox_chan *chan; > void __iomem *payload_ofs; > int mpam_fb_err = 0; > u32 status; > int ret; > > + pcc_chan = msc->pcc_chan; > if (!pcc_chan) > return -ENODEV; > > @@ -162,7 +165,7 @@ static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan, u32 msc_id, > mpam_fb_build_version_message(token, chan->shmem); > break; > default: > - dev_err(pcc_chan->pcc_cl.dev, "unsupported MPAM-Fb command %d\n", > + dev_err(&msc->pdev->dev, "unsupported MPAM-Fb command %d\n", > mpam_fb_command); > ret = -EINVAL; > goto out_err; > @@ -203,13 +206,13 @@ static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan, u32 msc_id, > > int mpam_fb_send_read_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *result) > { > - return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->id, reg, result, > + return mpam_fb_send_request(msc, msc->id, reg, result, > MPAM_MSC_READ_CMD); > } > > int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 value) > { > - return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->id, reg, &value, > + return mpam_fb_send_request(msc, msc->id, reg, &value, > MPAM_MSC_WRITE_CMD); > } > > @@ -219,7 +222,7 @@ int mpam_fb_check_protocol_version(struct mpam_msc *msc) > u32 version; > int ret; > > - ret = mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, 0, > + ret = mpam_fb_send_request(msc, 0, > 0, &version, MPAM_PROTOCOL_VERSION_CMD); > if (ret) > return ret;