[PATCH v2] ACPI: scan: Avoid registering platform devices with resource overlaps
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Aug 2026 21:28:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Linux Kernel Development - Intel |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> If acpi_dev_get_resources() returns overlapping I/O or memory resources, the subsequent registration of a platform device will fail with -EBUSY due to a resource conflict. This is reported to happen on Acer Aspire ES1-572 [1]. Avoid that by adjusting resources returned by acpi_dev_get_resources() to eliminate partial overlaps between them. This has not been regarded as necessary before because putting overlapping resources into the _CRS of one device is really pointless, but now that the issue has been reported to actually happen in the field, it needs to be done. Fixes: ab06eb920401 ("ACPI: scan: Register platform devices for fixed event buttons") Reported-by: Julien <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/CAJOGg3z6LJPDsdPNBxajgy8_wQxfhYBRxe4EiurZf3kPU5A5Bw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Cc: All applicable <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> --- v1 -> v2: * Add the expanded resource instead of and not in addition to the other overlapping one (Sashiko) --- drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c @@ -71,6 +71,47 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_platfo .notifier_call = acpi_platform_device_remove_notify, }; +static unsigned int acpi_platform_adjust_resources(struct acpi_device *adev, + struct resource *new_res, + struct resource *resources, + unsigned int count) +{ + unsigned int i; + + if (!(new_res->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM))) + return count; + + for (i = 0; i < count; ) { + struct resource *res = &resources[i]; + + if (resource_type(new_res) != resource_type(res) || + !resource_overlaps(new_res, res)) { + i++; + continue; + } + + dev_info(&adev->dev, "Adjusting %pR for %pR\n", new_res, res); + /* + * Extend the new resource to include the one that has been processed + * already. + */ + if (res->start < new_res->start) + new_res->start = res->start; + + if (res->end > new_res->end) + new_res->end = res->end; + + /* + * Eliminate the previously processed resource that has + * triggered the adjustment because it is not necessary any + * more. + */ + memmove(res, res + 1, (--count - i) * sizeof(*res)); + } + + return count; +} + static void acpi_platform_fill_resource(struct acpi_device *adev, const struct resource *src, struct resource *dest) { @@ -151,10 +192,14 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_plat return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } count = 0; - list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) + list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) { + count = acpi_platform_adjust_resources(adev, + rentry->res, + resources, + count); acpi_platform_fill_resource(adev, rentry->res, &resources[count++]); - + } acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); } }