Re: [PATCH] ACPI: APEI: Fix ERST timeout unit conversion
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:21:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0iB-3saQjzTwKPovLV8FLrYeG=vX756qZYvyby2Ph879Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:22 AM Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2026/7/22 2:25, Nirmoy Das wrote: > > The ACPI specification defines bits 63:32 returned by > > GET_EXECUTE_OPERATION_TIMINGS as the maximum execution time in > > microseconds. erst_get_timeout() instead multiplies the value by > > NSEC_PER_MSEC. > > > > Use NSEC_PER_USEC to express the firmware-provided microsecond timeout > > in the nanosecond units expected by erst_timedout(). > > > > Fixes: fac475aab70b ("ACPI: APEI: Use ERST timeout for slow devices") > > Cc: [email protected] > > Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c > > index bf65e34615314..15ab797641cfc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c > > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static inline u64 erst_get_timeout(void) > > > > if (erst_erange.attr & ERST_RANGE_SLOW) { > > timeout = ((erst_erange.timings & ERST_EXEC_TIMING_MAX_MASK) >> > > - ERST_EXEC_TIMING_MAX_SHIFT) * NSEC_PER_MSEC; > > + ERST_EXEC_TIMING_MAX_SHIFT) * NSEC_PER_USEC; > > Good catch! In the latest ACPI 6.6 spec, it says: > > [63:32] value in *microseconds* that the platform expects > would be the maximum amount of time it will take to > process and complete an EXECUTE_OPERATION. Applied as 7.3 material, thanks!