Re: [ACPI-sppt] I think it's patched...
Emma Jane Hogbin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:47:19PM +0100, S?rgio Monteiro Basto wrote: > should say yes to all unless, you know what you are doing, using modules > except to debug messages and ACPI_HT_ONLY, and toshiba if you dont have > a toshiba you should say no. > > so it works ok ? It now powers off correctly. :) The fan isn't whirring at 100miles an hour, but it's still on (quietly) a fair amount. I'm running debian stable right now so I can't test the acpi interface which is only available in unstable. I'm planning to upgrade soon so I'll be able to test everything then. In my /lib/modules/a directory I have the following modules: /lib/modules/2.4.20.030603d/kernel/drivers/acpi/ total 60k -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.1k Jun 3 23:57 ac.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9.5k Jun 3 23:57 battery.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.2k Jun 3 23:57 button.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.7k Jun 3 23:57 fan.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14k Jun 3 23:57 processor.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11k Jun 3 23:57 thermal.o -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.2k Jun 3 23:57 toshiba_acpi.o I've loaded them like this: Should I be loading them in a different order, or is this ok? lsmod: button 2420 0 (unused) battery 5960 0 (unused) ac 1832 0 (unused) fan 1608 0 (unused) thermal 6664 0 (unused) processor 8664 0 [thermal] (plus the toshiba one which I haven't loaded as I have an Acer) The rest were all compiled in using "Y" instead of "M". I still don't understand why they're not ospm_*. Does anyone else know why this is? Thanks so much for your help! emma -- Emma Jane Hogbin [[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.