Re: [ACPI-sppt] Problem with poweroff (was Re: plz help ACPI)

lu jun <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.acpi.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Here is the file.

--- Matt Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 Jul 2003 14:47, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > PLEASE! If you want to support us in helping you
> to solve your problem,
> 
> Well, I'm going to try following the rules, as I've
> just joined the list.  
> I've looked quite hard for a solution to my problem,
> but perhaps I just 
> haven't hit the right page yet.
> 
> > 1) start your system with an ACPI enabled kernel
> 
> I have an ACPI enabled 2.4.21 kernel, using
> acpi-20030619-2.4.21.diff.
> 
> > 2) load all of the available ACPI modules, e.g.
> using modprobe for each of
> > them. 
> 
> I have chosen to compile in everything rather than
> use modules.
> 
> 3) run dmesg to see if there are any ACPI related
> errors.
> 
> No errors; I see "ACPI: Subsystem revision 20030619"
> and some other useful 
> stuff, but no actual errors.
> 
> 5) check the files in the /proc/acpi/*
> subdirectories to
> > see if they seem to provide useful/correct
> information 
> 
> Everything seems fine.
> 
> > 7) do not forget to add some further information
> to your mail, including
> > your system type (laptop? brand?), if you actually
> have any problems with
> > your running system, what those problems are (more
> than one symptom per
> > mail, if possible) and how to reproduce them - and
> anything else that you
> > think might help us in understanding the problem
> and finding a solution.
> 
> Right.  Here goes.  I'm not sure if my problem is
> actually ACPI-related.  I 
> recently updated my kernel to the standard 2.4.21,
> because the SuSE-supplied 
> kernel (2.4.18) for SuSE 7.2 was causing occasional
> hangs.  Everything is 
> fine, and the hanging has gone away, but one problem
> remains: now, my PC 
> won't power off at shutdown.  I've tried halt -p
> (and poweroff) manually, 
> and all that happens is that I get a sound which I
> think is my hard drive 
> (IDE) parking, but then the system stays switched
> on.
> 
> I tried APM, which I was using before, and ACPI, and
> neither will power off 
> the machine.  With ACPI, if I "echo 5 >
> /proc/acpi/sleep", then the machine 
> does power off quite happily, so I think ACPI is
> working more than well 
> enough to enter the S5 state.  So what I'm wondering
> is if there's something 
> in halt/init that I need to update to take into
> account the fact that I'm 
> using ACPI.
> 
> The machine powers off quite happily under Windows. 
> Currently, I have 
> "ACPI-aware OS" selected in the BIOS.
> 
> I'm using a Gigabyte K7S5A motherboard with the
> latest available AMI BIOS, 
> and I've tried using a custom DSDT table with any
> compilation problems 
> fixed, but I'm guessing, as the echo > sleep works,
> that the core of ACPI is 
> working okay.
> 
> Any ideas, folks?  Even if no one can solve my
> problem, I'd appreciate a 
> pointer to a good page which describes how the
> halt/poweroff commands 
> interact with the kernel to perform a poweroff.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 
> -- 
> "It's the small gaps between the rain that count,
>  and learning how to live amongst them."
> 	      -- Jeff Noon
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
> ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
> available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual
> Studio .NET.
>
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> ACPI-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-support

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
lj-config-kernel-2.4.20-acpi-swsusp (application/octet-stream, 20.5 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.