Re: [ACPI-sppt] Re: Re: ACPI on IBM ThinkPad G40 update

Ducrot Bruno <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:10:51 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.acpi.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:38:03PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > take a look at
> > http://www.poupinou.org/acpi/ibm_ecdt.html
> 
> Well, i've compiled required tools, but command
> 
>     acpidmp ECDT | verify_ecdt > ecdt_table.h
> 
> shows message
> 
>     This table is correct.  No need to replace it.
> 
> and ecdt_table.h contains only C comment:
> 
> /*
>  * ECDT table before:
>  * dumping 0x804a198
>  * header:
>  *      signature ECDT
>  *      length: 81
>  *      revision: 0x1
>  *      checksum: 0x11
>  *      oem_id: IBM
>  *      oem_table_id: TP-1T
>  *      oem_revision: 0x1042
>  *      asl_compiler_id: IBM
>  *      asl_compiler_revision: 0x1
>  * ec_control:
>  *      address_space_id: 0x1
>  *      address_space_bit_width: 0x8
>  *      register_bit_offset: 0
>  *      reserved (should be 0): 0
>  *      address: 0x66
>  * ec_data:
>  *      address_space_id: 0x1
>  *      address_space_bit_width: 0x8
>  *      register_bit_offset: 0
>  *      reserved (should be 0): 0
>  *      address: 0x62
>  * uid: 0
>  * gpe: 0x1d
>  * ec_id: \_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC
>  * compute checksum: passed
> 
> I have noticed, that ACPI log in dmesg, that ACPI loaded
> successfully, but after a while it exited. See attached
> dmesg output.
> 
> Thanks for any help


Checked twice.  Your ECDT table is correct.
Perhaps a bug in acpi?

-- 
Ducrot Bruno

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf