RE: [ACPI-sppt] merge acpi-support into acpi-devel?
"Brown, Len" <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:48:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.support,gmane.linux.acpi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The archive shows that overall, acpi-support gets 18% the traffic that acpi-devel gets. There are newbie questions on LKML, and there is a FAQ to help them. I don't see why we shouldn't follow that model. The down-side of 2 lists is that people who post to acpi-devel will probably get better support, so one wonders what is the advantage of having 2 lists. -Len > -----Original Message----- > From: Sérgio Monteiro Basto [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 5:27 AM > To: Brown, Len > Cc: acpi support; acpi-devel > Subject: Re: [ACPI-sppt] merge acpi-support into acpi-devel? > > > On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 05:34, Len Brown wrote: > > It would make my life simpler if > [email protected] were > > merged into [email protected] and then disabled. > > > > Does having two lists make life simpler for anybody? > > For me, No. I think, the support mailing list, has more traffic and is > for newbies and some people who want try install acpi. They > can get help > here. > The devel mailing list is for the people who want (try) help > developing > acpi > When I had time I read the 2 lists, in other times I just > read the devel > one. I clean up the other. > > thanks > > > > > thanks, > > -Len > > > > > > -- > SérgioMB > email: [email protected] > > Who gives me one shell, give me everything. > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf