SUMMARY: Firewall Distro

"Christian Hack" <christianh-EwM+tGBLom00n/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.admin.managers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
OK I got quite a few responses...

Thanks to Darrell, Michael, Martin, Sam, Tino, Joakim, Richard, Seth, Bob,
Bob, Ben, George.

A number of people correctly pointed out I probably shouldn't be running a
server and firewall on the same machine. The most secure option is to run a
separate firewall and then run the server beind it. I was aware of the lower
security and I am comfortable with my decision to run them on the same piece
of hardware as I have for the past 4 odd years. Thanks for the heads up
though.

So specialist firewalls suggested include:
Smoothwall (www.smoothwall.org)
m0n0wall (http://neon1.net/m0n0wall/)
IPcop (www.ipcop.org)
Mandrake MNF (http://www.mandrakesoft.com/products/mnf) I mentioned I
already tried MNF and was not impressed with the web interface. Plus it was
quite a hassle just to get a manually initiated dialup running and working
correctly (unlike smoothwall)

All in one solutions include:
Mitel E-Smith SME (www.e-smith.org)
ClarkConnect (www.clarkconnect.org)

Solutions suggested for server (i.e. no firewall functions but behind a
specialist firewall) only type apps
Engarde (www.engardelinux.org)
E-Smith (www.e-smith.org)

A couple of people also suggest regular distros like BSD, RH7.3 and Debian
since they are relatively up to date. They fail to offer a complete web
configuration interfaces that specialist distros include. They also require
a lot of extra config and compiling after install. This is basically what I
did with my current RH6.2 server.

Another sort of option is Webmin www.webmin.com which provides a web-based
gui for setting up a varied number of Unix/Linux boxes like Debian, Redhat,
BSD, Solaris etc. I have used webmin extensively on my current box and I
really like it. Webadmin was suggested but I think he meant webmin.

I am currently evaluating ClarkConnect and although it looks very good, it
might just be a little limited for what I want. However since it's based on
RH7.3, theoretically most RH7.3 rpms will simply install if I want the extra
functionality. Next I will try Mitel's SME server. If that fails I think I
will go back to RH7.3 and do it manually.

Also this book was suggested for recommended reading on firewalls
http://www.bookpool.com/.x/p93pz7zpp0/sm/020163466X

Thanks
Christian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxmanagers-bounces-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
> [mailto:linuxmanagers-bounces-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]]On Behalf Of Christian
> Hack
> Sent: Monday, 28 April 2003 12:05 PM
> To: Linuxmanagers
> Subject: Firewall Distro
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm looking for a distro with firewalling and server type capabilities.
>
> Currently I have a heavily modified and customized Redhat 6.2 box
> which has
> served me quite well for over 3 years now. However it lacks some features
> and I seem to be unable to upgrade to a 2.4 kernel for iptables
> etc amongst
> other things.
>
> What I would like is something that can be setup through a web interface
> including things like port forwarding etc.
>
> Currently the box does the following functions:
>
> Firewall (ipchains and kernel 2.2.20)
> DNS (Bind)
> Mail (SMTP and POP server)
> Very light webserving (someone wants a big file etc)
> very light FTP (ditto)
> DHCP (for the internal network)
> Webmail (via Webmin)
> Port Forwarding (big customized TrinityOS script)
> Traffic Shaping (once we reach our bandwidth limit)
> DMZ (very very kludged to get Netmeeting to work but a lot of other stuff
> doesn't)
> No X server
>
> Any suggestions? First option is to simply take RH9 and customize
> it to the
> level of the current box. However I have used RH9 and I don't like the way
> that Redhat customize things which then breaks programs (memory
> page mapping
> has changed to be like the 2.5 kernel).
>
> Smoothwall is quite nice but doesn't provide the server type
> (mail, ftp, dns
> etc) features I want
> Mandrake Multi Network Firewall I thought was crap and I really
> didn't like
> their web interface.
>
> I'd like to keep the firewall and server parts on the same box
> too, just to
> keep the hardware simple as much as anything. Standard distros
> won't really
> have the web interface part and from what I have seen firewall
> type distros
> don't allow for mail, DNS etc.
>
> I don't mind paying to some extent, but I am looking for something that is
> relatively free.
>
> Thanks
>
> Christian Hack
> R&D ENGINEER
> christianh-EwM+tGBLom00n/[email protected]
> EDMI Product Development Division
> Ph : +61 7 3881 6444
> FAX : +61 7 3881 6420
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org
> submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
> subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers
_______________________________________________
LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org
submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.