SUMMARY: Firewall Distro
"Christian Hack" <christianh-EwM+tGBLom00n/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.admin.managers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK I got quite a few responses... Thanks to Darrell, Michael, Martin, Sam, Tino, Joakim, Richard, Seth, Bob, Bob, Ben, George. A number of people correctly pointed out I probably shouldn't be running a server and firewall on the same machine. The most secure option is to run a separate firewall and then run the server beind it. I was aware of the lower security and I am comfortable with my decision to run them on the same piece of hardware as I have for the past 4 odd years. Thanks for the heads up though. So specialist firewalls suggested include: Smoothwall (www.smoothwall.org) m0n0wall (http://neon1.net/m0n0wall/) IPcop (www.ipcop.org) Mandrake MNF (http://www.mandrakesoft.com/products/mnf) I mentioned I already tried MNF and was not impressed with the web interface. Plus it was quite a hassle just to get a manually initiated dialup running and working correctly (unlike smoothwall) All in one solutions include: Mitel E-Smith SME (www.e-smith.org) ClarkConnect (www.clarkconnect.org) Solutions suggested for server (i.e. no firewall functions but behind a specialist firewall) only type apps Engarde (www.engardelinux.org) E-Smith (www.e-smith.org) A couple of people also suggest regular distros like BSD, RH7.3 and Debian since they are relatively up to date. They fail to offer a complete web configuration interfaces that specialist distros include. They also require a lot of extra config and compiling after install. This is basically what I did with my current RH6.2 server. Another sort of option is Webmin www.webmin.com which provides a web-based gui for setting up a varied number of Unix/Linux boxes like Debian, Redhat, BSD, Solaris etc. I have used webmin extensively on my current box and I really like it. Webadmin was suggested but I think he meant webmin. I am currently evaluating ClarkConnect and although it looks very good, it might just be a little limited for what I want. However since it's based on RH7.3, theoretically most RH7.3 rpms will simply install if I want the extra functionality. Next I will try Mitel's SME server. If that fails I think I will go back to RH7.3 and do it manually. Also this book was suggested for recommended reading on firewalls http://www.bookpool.com/.x/p93pz7zpp0/sm/020163466X Thanks Christian > -----Original Message----- > From: linuxmanagers-bounces-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected] > [mailto:linuxmanagers-bounces-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]]On Behalf Of Christian > Hack > Sent: Monday, 28 April 2003 12:05 PM > To: Linuxmanagers > Subject: Firewall Distro > > > Hi guys, > > I'm looking for a distro with firewalling and server type capabilities. > > Currently I have a heavily modified and customized Redhat 6.2 box > which has > served me quite well for over 3 years now. However it lacks some features > and I seem to be unable to upgrade to a 2.4 kernel for iptables > etc amongst > other things. > > What I would like is something that can be setup through a web interface > including things like port forwarding etc. > > Currently the box does the following functions: > > Firewall (ipchains and kernel 2.2.20) > DNS (Bind) > Mail (SMTP and POP server) > Very light webserving (someone wants a big file etc) > very light FTP (ditto) > DHCP (for the internal network) > Webmail (via Webmin) > Port Forwarding (big customized TrinityOS script) > Traffic Shaping (once we reach our bandwidth limit) > DMZ (very very kludged to get Netmeeting to work but a lot of other stuff > doesn't) > No X server > > Any suggestions? First option is to simply take RH9 and customize > it to the > level of the current box. However I have used RH9 and I don't like the way > that Redhat customize things which then breaks programs (memory > page mapping > has changed to be like the 2.5 kernel). > > Smoothwall is quite nice but doesn't provide the server type > (mail, ftp, dns > etc) features I want > Mandrake Multi Network Firewall I thought was crap and I really > didn't like > their web interface. > > I'd like to keep the firewall and server parts on the same box > too, just to > keep the hardware simple as much as anything. Standard distros > won't really > have the web interface part and from what I have seen firewall > type distros > don't allow for mail, DNS etc. > > I don't mind paying to some extent, but I am looking for something that is > relatively free. > > Thanks > > Christian Hack > R&D ENGINEER > christianh-EwM+tGBLom00n/[email protected] > EDMI Product Development Division > Ph : +61 7 3881 6444 > FAX : +61 7 3881 6420 > _______________________________________________ > LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org > submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected] > subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers _______________________________________________ LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected] subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers