SUMMARY: symbolic link and touch
Adam Bisbe <bblp-/[email protected]> Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:18:21 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.admin.managers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, you are right: > It's been noticeable that over the last few months, while people are > asking as many questions as ever, relatively few are bothering to post > a > summary of answers received. But the summary is that I have not solved my problem, I got answers from 4 people, with good explanations about the differences between hard link and simbolic link, but all agreed that it is impossible to change the date on a simbolic link. Original question > symbolic link and touch > I had to restore a filesystem on a new hard disc with lots of symbolic > links (ln -s), those files took the date from the day I restore them, > not from the day they where created on the old disc. > touching them with 'touch -t xxxxxxxxx' will not change their date. Is > it impossible to keep or change the date of a symbolic link? > The behaviour I would expect would be to take the date of the > destination file (am I wrong?). I posted another question a month ago and I got very few answers and I did not solve my problem, so I did not issue a Summary. Adam _______________________________________________ LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected] subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers