glibc and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[email protected] Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.admin.managers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Managers, I have a situation that requires a newer version of glibc. I would like to be able to do this w/o having to upgrade all my machines to a newer operating system. I have many Redhat 7.3 systems that come with libc-2.2.5.so I have some newer applications that require GLIBC_2.3.3 So I downloaded the sources from gnu.org and compiled and installed the same under /usr/local/glibc by doing a configure; make ; make install and then set my LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/local/glibc/lib Now any command that I run gives me a core dump(ofcourse, I can unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH and everything is ok) I am also unable to run the application that I need to run. The program I am trying to run is available only in binary format and running an ldd on it gives me /lib/i686/libc.so.6 as one of the libraries that are needed(and version 2.3.3.) Has anyone else had the need to have multiple glibc versions ? All ideas are welcome :-) Thanks, /dev/null [email protected] _______________________________________________ LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected] subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers