Re: arecord command line options

Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.alsa.user
Message-ID <20200929082712.0a37fcd7@archlinux>
Oops

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:19:54 +0200
From: Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: PS: [Alsa-user] arecord command line options

>It's for 24 bit, 192000 Hz sample rate. FWIW professional
>studio audio recordings are usually done at 48000 Hz.
>A sample rate > 48000 Hz doesn't gain better audio quality. To increase
>audio quality you need to replace the prosumer by a professional audio
>interface. Even if the E-MU 0202 USB should use good converters, it
>much likely suffers from a not that good analog component. Loosely
>speaking, recording frequencies that are inaudible for humans and/or
>not playable by analog audio equipment, doesn't increase the audio
>quality. It's common to cut frequencies that are inaudible for good
>reasons. When taking photos or when filming you don't increase the
>image quality by including ultraviolet light, actually it's better to
>get rid of ultraviolet light.
>Again loosely speaking, the higher the bit rate, the better, but very  
                                        ^^^^^^^^ this should read bit
                                        depth ;)

>high bit rates are just an advantage for further processing, not for  
      ^^^^^^^^^

>just playing and listening.
>In short, with your device you much likely get the best result with 24
>bit, 48000 Hz. When using a sample rate > 48000 Hz you unlikely will
>benefit from a possible advantage, you more likely will suffer from
>a possible negative side effect
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.