Re: re-categorization
bero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.arklinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Pupeno wrote:
> As you may know I wanted to work on the re-categorization of ark rpms but
> changing all the rpms will mean people will have to re-download anything and
> in a dial-up that's bad... so, I've come with the idea of doing the
> re-categorization but don't change version, so people won't re-download but
> the recategorization will be done and in the next build of a package, the
> re-categorization will be active.
Not a very good idea, because apt and the checksum apps don't like that at
all.
Let's just do the re-categorization step by step -- change it when we're
changing something in the package anyway (and people will have to download
the updated package anyway).
Since we'll be updating to gcc 3.4 soonish (it entered deep freeze ("open
for bug fixes for regressions only") 2 weeks ago), we'll have to rebuild
pretty much every package soon anyway.
No reason not to start recategorizing packages right away though -- we
should discuss the right categories as soon as possible.
LLaP
bero
--
Ark Linux - Linux for the masses
http://www.arklinux.org/
Redistribution and processing of this message is subject to
http://www.arklinux.org/terms.php