Re: Logo Contest

Derek Croxton <croxton3-/[email protected]> Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:20:21 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.arklinux.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Zackary Deems <[email protected]> writes:

> 
> Well..  I need your help at this point.  8 people voted on a selection 
> of 19 different graphics.
> The 'winner' at this point received 3 votes.  As easy as it would be to 
> simply declare that graphic the winner (especially since its the one I 
> like best), I'm not comfortable making the decision to use that when 
> much less than a majority of us have said we like it.
> 
> Our logo is what people will associate with us.  When they see it, they 
> will think of Ark.  That means it needs to be an image we can all stand 
> behind.  So..  what should we do?  Shall we choose the top two vote 
> receiving graphics and vote again?  Shall we just use the one with the 
> most votes already?
> 
> If I don't get any feedback on this.. I'll make a decision, but I want 
> to give everyone an opportunity to voice their opinion.
> 
> Z
> 
> 
> 


Okay, I'm probably being an idiot, but where are the designs?  I found the
contest announcement, but I haven't been able to find a link to the logos
submitted, nor to anything about voting.

I would have submitted a design, but I didn't get the announcement until the May
17th mailing, and I didn't have time to do it after that.  I feel strongly that
ArkLinux should be a penguin in an ark (a la Noah).  That's what I thought of
when I first saw the name "ArkLinux," and that's what I assumed the developers
meant it to be:  a rescue for those lost in the flood of Linux.  I love Linux
and have devoted many hours to learning it, but I still spend a lot of time
confused because I can't figure out how to do something.  ArkLinux is the best
I've found at minimizing my confusion.  None of the logos I have seen (by
looking at individual posts on this newsgroup) have had any references to the
word "ark," which is okay, but I think it would be better if the logo and the
name were related.