Re: ... and yet again, an upgrade is damaging

On Monday 22 November 2004 19:41, you wrote:
> > Huh? ghostscript has never, ever been in Ark Linux, we've used espgs from
> > day one.
>
> No Ghostscript is in arklinux, and has been in use for a while. Maybe not
> day one, but it is sure there now.

No it isn't, I've checked a complete tree. espgs is there (espgs is a fork of 
ghostscript), ghostscript isn't.

# rpm -qf `which gs`
espgs-7.07.2-0.20040822.1ark

/me wonders if rpm changed its behavior in Provides:/Obsoletes: lately... 
espgs provides ghostscript (and has always done so), but it doesn't seem to 
be picked up on some boxes.

LLaP
bero