[RE] Poorer performance with Raid0 then without?

"Listbox" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ataraid
Organization hymerfania.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Here is more hdparm data. It looks like bad news.

Note: for whatever reason, /dev/md0 does not seem to be my RAID device. I
set up my raid (via trial and error) with dmraid, and it gave me
/dev/mapper/sil_agbgdgbjfhei. I have always felt there was something
not-right about  that.
Second, the errors hdparm reports from -tT look significant.
Finally, "Timing cached reads" are much lower then single drives. I don't
know what this really means in a RAID context. 

I tried removing the third drive on the board (primary slave), no effect. 

Anyway, given the errors, is this a RAID software problem, or a piece of
junk RAID adapter card?

Thanks so much, folks.

Listbox
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *

/dev/hde:
 multcount    = 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  0 (default 16-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  0 (off)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    = 256 (on)
 geometry     = 19457/255/63, sectors = 312581808, start = 0

/dev/hdg:
 multcount    = 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  0 (default 16-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  0 (off)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    = 256 (on)
 geometry     = 19457/255/63, sectors = 312581808, start = 0

* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *


hprarm -tT /dev/md0
read() hit EOF - device too small

/dev/md0:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  read() hit EOF - device too small
BLKFLSBUF failed: No such device
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: No such device

hprarm -tT /dev/mapper/sil_agbgdgbjfhei
/dev/mapper/sil_agbgdgbjfhei:
 Timing cached reads:   HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete)
failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
1288 MB in  2.00 seconds = 643.22 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete)
failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
284 MB in  3.01 seconds =  94.27 MB/sec
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
dev/hda:
Timing cached reads:   1668 MB in  2.00 seconds = 834.10 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:   88 MB in  3.05 seconds =  28.87 MB/sec

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffered disk reads:  
/dev/hdc:
Timing cached reads:   1696 MB in  2.00 seconds = 847.36 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:   88 MB in  3.05 seconds =  28.82 MB/sec

/dev/hde:
Timing cached reads:   1680 MB in  2.00 seconds = 838.49 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:  168 MB in  3.03 seconds =  55.46 MB/sec

/dev/hdf:
Timing cached reads:   1688 MB in  2.00 seconds = 843.57 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:  164 MB in  3.00 seconds =  54.59 MB/sec

/dev/hdg:
Timing cached reads:   1696 MB in  2.00 seconds = 846.68 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:  162 MB in  3.03 seconds =  53.45 MB/sec
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.