RE: raid10 vs raid01 type in dmraid
"Gaston, Jason D" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ataraid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE070176D51D@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com> |
> >Eg, PC Magazine: >"RAID 10, RAID 100 - Speed and Fault Tolerance >RAID 10 is RAID 1 + 0. The drives are striped for performance >(RAID 0), and all striped drives are duplicated (RAID 1) for >fault tolerance." > >Yes, I konw, there's different (aargh!) definitions out there. > >Like I said: the top -> bottom of the stack definition is preferable >to me (you reach the mirror first and the stripe second while walking >the stack from the top to the bottom). > >We just got to hold on to one definition in dmraid, > >Heinz > Ok, so the dmraid definition is not going to change. Do you see an advantage in putting the RAID1 vs. RAID0 on the bottom for being able to perform rebuilds easier? I need to decide which way to do with isw. Thanks, Jason