RE: raid10 vs raid01 type in dmraid

"Gaston, Jason D" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ataraid
Message-ID <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE070176D51D@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com>
>
>Eg, PC Magazine:
>"RAID 10, RAID 100 - Speed and Fault Tolerance
>RAID 10 is RAID 1 + 0. The drives are striped for performance 
>(RAID 0), and all striped drives are duplicated (RAID 1) for 
>fault tolerance."
>
>Yes, I konw, there's different (aargh!) definitions out there.
>
>Like I said: the top -> bottom of the stack definition is preferable
>to me (you reach the mirror first and the stripe second while walking
>the stack from the top to the bottom).
>
>We just got to hold on to one definition in dmraid,
>
>Heinz
>

Ok, so the dmraid definition is not going to change.

Do you see an advantage in putting the RAID1 vs. RAID0 on the bottom for
being able to perform rebuilds easier?  I need to decide which way to do
with isw.

Thanks,

Jason
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.