Re: Raid5 on new kernels.

"Anders Aagaard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ataraid
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hm, that's really unfortunate.  I bought this motherboard to replace another
one, to get the ICH9R, figuring it'd be well supported (intel is generally
fairly safe, and I knew about dmraid's existance, and I've used it with
raid0 before).  And while this was software raid before, this computer now
has to act as a driver testing system as well, which is why it needs a dual
boot setup with different versions of windows, so linux software raid is a
bit out of the picture.

Could you point me at the dmraid/isw cvs tree's?  I've been looking around a
bit and been unable to find them.  And I'll atleast read the cvs log to see
how experimental it'd be.

On 7/22/07, James McEvoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anders,
>
> The raid456 kernel module is part of the software raid used my mdadm.  The
> RAID 5 support in the isw driver is still under development by Intel.  You
> may be able to get it to work if you get the latest isw source from cvs but
> I do not think it is ready for production yet.
>
> If I remember right: when I installed Fedora 7 anaconda had a newer
> version of isw then the system did when it booted normally or it would have
> been that dmraid was configured better in anaconda than the regular kernel.
>
> I ended up not configuring the drives for RAID in the bios by setting them
> to AHCI mode using software RAID (mdadm).  Make sure that you remove the
> RAID labeling from the disks before trying to use software RAID.  You can
> remove the labels with the bios or using the dmraid utility... I found that
> the dmraid utility does a better job.
>
> The main reason I ended up using mdadm for my system is that the isw
> driver that came with Fedora 7 would recognize and configure RAID 0+1 or
> mirrored in my ICH8R chipset but the isw driver would not rebuild a new disk
> when I replaced it.  I needed to use RAID 5 and did not have enough 500 gig
> disks to test a cvs version of isw in RAID 5 mode.
>
> I do not know if a working isw driver for Intel RAID will preform better
> than mdadm RAID with the disks in AHCI mode but I feel safer using the well
> tested mdadm software RAID.
>
>   --jim
>
> On 7/22/07, Anders Aagaard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I've been desperately trying to setup dmraid raid5 on a recent kernel
> > since last night.
> >
> > My problem is that my chipset (ICH9R) is only supported on recent
> > kernels, and the dmraid patches for raid5 seems to only work on older
> > kernels.
> >
> > Is there any way I can get dmraid to use the raid456 module provided by
> > new kernels?  Or any patch available to for 2.6.21/2.6.22 for dmraid's
> > raid5 module?
> >
> > I desperately need this up and running before monday, any help would be
> > highly appreciated.
> >
> > Anders
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ataraid-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ataraid-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
>

_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.