Re: Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel,gmane.linux.ataraid,gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Luca Berra wrote: > And by activating a vg manually i don't benefit from the filter? why? Huh? I fail to see the direction you are going in with this and what it has to do with udev auto configuring things. > What about if it is a ha-cluster suite that needs to activate the volume > group. I can't have udev activate that on sight, it will probably > corrupt data. Right, which is why you wouldn't be using udev in such a set up. At least not configured to auto mount disks when plugged in. > probably because this is the only available way now. > anyway this method tends to suck when you have a complex setup. > and lvm device filters are not very intuitive to setup. You just made my point for me. > Let's make a deal, you code that in udev, and in the meantime try to > convince Linus in ditching partition detection code from kernel. > I will code the filter for current lvm. The partition table code already can be disabled in the kernel config iirc. > doing this will require changing how lvm tools work. > 1) disable the automatic vgscan performed by every lvm command > 2) modify pvscan to be able to scan a single device Correct. The commands need to be able to take a list of devices to manipulate rather than going after /dev/sd*.