Re: Invalid RAID config table checksum (Adaptec 1210SA)
Tom <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:16:22 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ataraid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Phillip, Phillip Susi wrote: > Tom wrote: >> I could also update to Ubuntu 8.10, which is planned, but I've noticed >> that the version included in this release is still only at 1.0.0-rc14. >> What has happened to rc15 in Intrepid? Is there a package update >> planned by the maintainer? > > It didn't make it into the Intrepid release cycle in time. I see! Well, it's apparently made it to into Jaunty, so that's good news. :) >> I'm more interested in finding a solution to the problem, and learning >> more about the checksums. Is there some way I can begin investigating >> this issue myself? Unfortunately, I fear my aspirations shall run away >> with me, but any insight/starting information to fixing the problem >> would be welcome. > > Take a look at lib/format/ataraid/asr.h for the layout of the metadata. > Hexedit it by hand and see if the rest of it appears to make sense. If > it is just the checksum that is wrong, then correct it. I'll see what I can gather. Just for reference (in case it's been missed) the checksum I receive (0xBAF vs. 0x805) and the checksum 'ml' received (0xF36 vs. 0x805) are different. Presumably it's just the table format, and not the contained metadata that is checksum'd? > By the way, I assume that your bios refuses to recognize the array either? The RAID card is perfectly happy with the array. It's rather bizarre. I may see if I can install Windows on it when I have some time. Thanks! Tom