RE: Picking up development of dmraid

Mark-Willem Jansen <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:19:59 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ataraid
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0174921995738401975==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_884b693e-8508-443d-b9a4-7b72d8763367_"

--_884b693e-8508-443d-b9a4-7b72d8763367_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi Ryan=2C


You will have to wait a while=2C I first need to learn more about the inter=
ior of mdadm.


I will start with reading the intel implementation.



But if you can point me to other information besides source-codes=2C that w=
ould be great.


Greetings=2C


Mark-Willem

> Date: Thu=2C 19 Jul 2012 16:58:35 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Picking up development of dmraid
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 07/19/2012 03:30 PM=2C Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
> > I do not know the finer detail of mdadm=2C yet. But I saw
> > super-mbr.c and super-gpt.c and and draw the conclusion=2C taken how
> > dmraid handles mbr=2C that these were codes to parse mbt and gpt
> > partition tables.
>=20
> Ah=2C gotcha - I think this code was introduced a few years after the
> external metadata support was added (not sure though=2C would have to
> look in git) and is handled in the same manner as the DDF=2C Intel and
> native MD metadata formats.
>=20
> Unlike those formats though you cannot assemble arrays from MBR or gpt
> metadata - they're only used when adding new bare devices to arrays so
> that the member partitions can be used.
>=20
> >> I think adding new format handlers to MD is a much better idea=3B=20
> >> the dominant formats backed by major OEMs are already using it
> >> so if there's interest in the less commonly used formats I think
> >> they would see much better maintenance and continued development
> >> in an active project like mdadm than they would in a revived
> >> dmraid.
> >=20
> > So it would be time that someone(probably me) starts adding the=20
> > Promise formats used by the AMD chip-sets.
>=20
> Cool! Seems like a good direction. I'd be interested in having a look
> at this too.
>=20
> Regards=2C
> Bryn.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>=20
> iEYEARECAAYFAlAILqoACgkQ6YSQoMYUY967mgCg1R+u1ROnHe1gEmD56gPVA4Ot
> 3f8AoKtc7IKv6Sct5RIj16ovqa+rqpO5
> =3DqyIZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 		 	   		  =

--_884b693e-8508-443d-b9a4-7b72d8763367_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
Hi Ryan=2C<BR><br><BR>You will have to wait a while=2C I first need to lear=
n more about the interior of mdadm.<BR><br><BR>I will start with reading th=
e intel implementation.<br><BR><br><BR>But if you can point me to other inf=
ormation besides source-codes=2C that would be great.<BR><br><BR>Greetings=
=2C<BR><br><BR>Mark-Willem<BR><br><div>&gt=3B Date: Thu=2C 19 Jul 2012 16:5=
8:35 +0100<br>&gt=3B From: [email protected]<br>&gt=3B To: ataraid-list@redhat=
.com<br>&gt=3B CC: [email protected]<br>&gt=3B Subject: Re: Picking up=
 development of dmraid<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--=
---<br>&gt=3B Hash: SHA1<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B On 07/19/2012 03:30 PM=2C Mar=
k-Willem Jansen wrote:<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B I do not know the finer detail of m=
dadm=2C yet. But I saw<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B super-mbr.c and super-gpt.c and and=
 draw the conclusion=2C taken how<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B dmraid handles mbr=2C th=
at these were codes to parse mbt and gpt<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B partition tables.=
<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B Ah=2C gotcha - I think this code was introduced a few=
 years after the<br>&gt=3B external metadata support was added (not sure th=
ough=2C would have to<br>&gt=3B look in git) and is handled in the same man=
ner as the DDF=2C Intel and<br>&gt=3B native MD metadata formats.<br>&gt=3B=
 <br>&gt=3B Unlike those formats though you cannot assemble arrays from MBR=
 or gpt<br>&gt=3B metadata - they're only used when adding new bare devices=
 to arrays so<br>&gt=3B that the member partitions can be used.<br>&gt=3B <=
br>&gt=3B &gt=3B&gt=3B I think adding new format handlers to MD is a much b=
etter idea=3B <br>&gt=3B &gt=3B&gt=3B the dominant formats backed by major =
OEMs are already using it<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B&gt=3B so if there's interest in =
the less commonly used formats I think<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B&gt=3B they would se=
e much better maintenance and continued development<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B&gt=3B =
in an active project like mdadm than they would in a revived<br>&gt=3B &gt=
=3B&gt=3B dmraid.<br>&gt=3B &gt=3B <br>&gt=3B &gt=3B So it would be time th=
at someone(probably me) starts adding the <br>&gt=3B &gt=3B Promise formats=
 used by the AMD chip-sets.<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B Cool! Seems like a good di=
rection. I'd be interested in having a look<br>&gt=3B at this too.<br>&gt=
=3B <br>&gt=3B Regards=2C<br>&gt=3B Bryn.<br>&gt=3B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR=
E-----<br>&gt=3B Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)<br>&gt=3B Comment: Usin=
g GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B iEY=
EARECAAYFAlAILqoACgkQ6YSQoMYUY967mgCg1R+u1ROnHe1gEmD56gPVA4Ot<br>&gt=3B 3f8=
AoKtc7IKv6Sct5RIj16ovqa+rqpO5<br>&gt=3B =3DqyIZ<br>&gt=3B -----END PGP SIGN=
ATURE-----<br></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_884b693e-8508-443d-b9a4-7b72d8763367_--


--===============0174921995738401975==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
--===============0174921995738401975==--