[LAD] Re: Status of Pipewire
Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.audio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Wim Taymans wrote: > real JACK is more mature and does things differently (mostly device > wakeup with IRQ instead of timers) The real difference between the two methods is 'sample count' versus 'time' as the source of the event that starts a period. I always wondered why one would use a timer, it just amounts to polling. Suppose you look every 1 ms to check if there are enough samples for a period. That means you can be up to 1 ms late. Compare that to the period time of 1.33 ms when using 64 samples / 48 kHz. Up to 3/4 of the available time to compute a period could be lost... Or am I missing something ? Ciao, -- FA _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list -- linux-audio-dev-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audio-dev-leave-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected]