[LAD] Re: Update of zita-at1

Robin Gareus <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:24:20 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.audio.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 2024-04-20 16:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> With the new logic deciding on forward / backward jumps, the
> low latency mode just came for free

Except the latency in zita-at1 0.8.1 is still around ~20ms, compared 2ms 
when using the current plugin's "fast mode".

> Re. microtuning individual notes: I don't think the retuning
> is ever accurate enough for this to be of any use. Or maybe
> I misunderstand what you refer to.

It allows one to detune individual notes, and it is sufficiency accurate 
(not unlike changing the reference pitch or notebias).

Those controls are not exposed in the custom plugin UI. They are control 
ports that show up as automation lines in Ardour, or when editing the 
plugin with a generic control UI.

I think it is best to leave the current plugin as-is. Doing so will not 
break existing sessions using the plugin.

I have started a new project without all the custom patches made to the 
AT1 DSP, and without the variants of the current plugin. The new plugin 
will closely follow the upcoming zita-AT2.

> What would be great (in particular for zita-at2) would be
> a mode were you can e.g. select a region in Ardour, have it
> analysed, present the result graphically so it can be edited,
> and finally apply the edited version to the region...

It's highly unlikely that we'll reinvent Melodyne. The hard and time 
consuming part is not the DSP, but the the GUI. It is a full time 
project by itself.

But you never know, someone might step up and file a pull request out of 
the blue. Things like this happened before.

--
robin

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list -- linux-audio-dev-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audio-dev-leave-cunTk1MwBs/[email protected]

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 840 B)