[LAD] Re: PandaResampler 0.2.0

Robin Gareus:
> Subject: [LAD] Re: PandaResampler 0.2.0
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
>         protocol="application/pgp-signature";
>         boundary="------------aDq7SRXL2hBrSytcfa1CO5Lw"
>
> On 2024-06-10 03:16, Yuri wrote:
> > On 6/9/24 15:47, Marc Lavallée wrote:
> >>
> > Why do people still insist on GNU Tools?
> >
>
> mostly to aid cross compilation. It is still the option that sucks least
> for libraries, notably to specify which symbols to expose in a cross
> platform library. Though meson is catching up.
>

Yes, auto tools give the least amount of problems for cross
compilation. (cmake is usually a nightmare for cross compilation.) I
would also add that auto tools give the least amount of problems in
general, it's extremely mature, but I haven't used meson very much.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]